HAVE YOU BEEN LIED TO?™ Citizens For A Better America® BALLOT MEASURES: CALIFORNIA Prop. 204 - NO. Prop. 205 - NO Prop. 206 - NO Prop. 207 - NO Prop. 208 - NO Prop. 209 - Yes Prop. 210 - NO Prop. 211 - NO Prop. 212 - Yes see below Prop. 213 - NO Prop. 214 - NO Prop. 215 - NO Prop. 216 - NO Prop. 217 - NO Prop. 218 - Yes Prop. 212 - Normally at first glance, Citizens For A Better America® would be in opposition to such a measure but our Honorary National Chairman, Congressman Bill Dannemeyer who is on the Yes on 212 Advisory Board, made the following convincing argument. In a written statement Congressman Dannemeyer states: “To put this in perspective, when I first ran for the State Assembly in 1962, the total primary and general election expenses did not exceeded $10,000 and I won. The value of the dollar has depreciated by a factor of five since then, so a campaign expenditure of $50,000 equivalent in 1962 for an Assembly seat has now escalated to the point where it takes between $250,000 and one million to win today! This quantity of money has escalated to the point where it has corrupted our political system and it has to change. Prop. 212 is the vehicle to achieve this by limiting Out of District contributions to NO more than 25% of the total.” Signed: Bill Dannemeyer. (Member, U.S. House of Representatives, 1979-1992, Member, California State Assembly, 1963-1966, 1976-1977.) COLORADO Amendment 11 - NO, it is ludicrous to tax

See a PDF of the actual page as published:  State Ballot Measures - CA and CO

Previous Page

1996 General Election - Page 8 of 8

Next Page